We are light on ideology and heavy on creativity and innovation. Not subscribing to any 'isms', we flirt with varied ideas before settling for one with the most relevance. We prefer solutions had that are intuitive, of equitable use, have flexibility, involve low physical effort, work within context and constraint, communicate ideas visually, are experimentally satisfying, conform to codes, demonstrate environmental sensitivity and importantly, enable future-forward concepts. The stylistic representation of the ideas is what is best suited for the situation. For us, for any design to succeed, a clearly articulated line of thought should bind it all together with dimensional interpretation that is consistent and careful. Added to that, a conceptual departure that in hindsight would appear almost intuitive.